Guide: Snowball Sampling

Snowball sampling is a non-probability sampling technique where existing study subjects recruit future subjects from among their acquaintances, creating a chain-referral system. It's useful for accessing hidden populations.
Author's Avatar

Author: Daniel Croft

Daniel Croft is an experienced continuous improvement manager with a Lean Six Sigma Black Belt and a Bachelor's degree in Business Management. With more than ten years of experience applying his skills across various industries, Daniel specializes in optimizing processes and improving efficiency. His approach combines practical experience with a deep understanding of business fundamentals to drive meaningful change.

Guide: Snowball Sampling

Snowball sampling is an innovative research strategy tailored for investigations where target populations are elusive or dispersed. It operates on a referral basis, starting with a small group of initial respondents who then recommend further participants from their networks, much like a snowball growing as it rolls. This method shines in its ability to uncover insights from within tightly knit or marginalized communities where direct access may be challenging. It’s an iterative, dynamic process that unfolds through personal connections, making it an invaluable tool in social sciences, marketing research, and beyond, for tapping into the wealth of knowledge residing in hidden or specialized groups.

What is Snowball Sampling

Snowball sampling stands out as a distinctive approach within the landscape of research methodologies, particularly suited for scenarios where the target population is elusive or obscured from direct access. This method diverges from probability sampling techniques, where each member of a population has a known chance of being selected. Instead, snowball sampling thrives on the premise of leveraging social networks and relationships to reach respondents. The foundational mechanism of snowball sampling is the chain referral process. Initially identified subjects (often referred to as “seeds”) are tasked with the role of nominating or referring other individuals within their network who meet the study’s criteria. This process is iterative, with new participants similarly asked to refer others, thereby creating a growing network of respondents. The metaphor of a snowball rolling downhill, gradually increasing in size, aptly captures the essence of this sampling method, as each round of referrals potentially adds more participants to the study, expanding the reach and depth of the research.

The appeal of snowball sampling lies in its ability to penetrate groups that are typically challenging for researchers to access through more conventional means. For example, populations with rare characteristics or those within closed communities often remain beyond the reach of standard sampling techniques due to privacy concerns, trust issues, or the sheer rarity of the population traits of interest. Snowball sampling, with its reliance on the trust and social connections within these communities, offers a pathway to gather valuable insights from these hard-to-reach groups.

When to Use Snowball Sampling

Identifying the appropriate context for employing snowball sampling is crucial for its successful application. This method is particularly potent in research endeavors where the population of interest is not just difficult to access but may also be unaware of their relevance to the study or inherently distrustful of traditional research approaches. Here are several scenarios where snowball sampling proves invaluable:

  • Researching Rare Diseases: For conditions affecting a small fraction of the population, finding a sufficient number of participants through general outreach can be daunting. Snowball sampling allows researchers to start with a few known cases and expand their sample through referrals within patient communities.

  • Studying Specific Professional Networks: Certain professions may form tight-knit communities with limited entry points for outsiders. Researchers looking to understand these professional dynamics or gather industry-specific insights can benefit from snowball sampling, starting with a handful of accessible individuals and branching out through their professional contacts.

  • Exploring Communities with Private or Sensitive Identities: Some groups, such as those defined by particular social, cultural, or personal identities, may be inaccessible due to privacy concerns or the sensitive nature of their association. Snowball sampling, by leveraging the trust within these communities, enables researchers to reach participants who might otherwise remain invisible.

  • Conducting Exploratory Research: In the early stages of research, especially when dealing with unknown or poorly defined populations, snowball sampling can help in mapping out the landscape of the study area. It allows researchers to identify and connect with subjects who can provide insights into the community or issue being explored, even when definitive lists or databases of the population do not exist.

The strategic choice to employ snowball sampling hinges on a clear understanding of the target population’s accessibility and the nature of the research questions. When the conventional doors to a community are closed, snowball sampling offers a unique window into the lives and experiences of those within, allowing for a deeper and more nuanced understanding of their realities.

How to Conduct Snowball Sampling

Snowball sampling is a methodological approach that unfolds through a series of structured steps, each pivotal to the integrity and success of the research process. This method, characterized by its iterative nature, relies on the initial and subsequent participants to expand the sample size through their networks. Here’s a detailed look at each step involved in snowball sampling:

Step 1: Identify Seed Participants

The outset of snowball sampling is marked by the identification and selection of seed participants. These seeds are crucial as they serve as the entry point into the networks that researchers aim to explore. Selecting seed participants involves a strategic approach where individuals are chosen based on their potential to initiate the referral chain effectively. Seeds are typically well-connected or influential members within the target population, possessing the characteristics of interest to the study and the ability to recruit subsequent participants from their social circles. The success of the snowball sampling process can often hinge on the appropriateness and engagement of these seed participants.

Step 2: Data Collection from Seeds

Once the seed participants are identified, the next step involves collecting data from them. This can be executed through various methods such as interviews, surveys, questionnaires, or any other suitable data collection technique that aligns with the research objectives. The initial data collection phase is critical as it not only provides the first layer of data for the study but also sets the stage for expanding the research through the seeds’ networks. Engaging effectively with seed participants at this stage is essential to motivate them for the subsequent recruitment of new participants.

Step 3: Recruitment of New Participants

Following data collection, seed participants are asked to identify or recruit other potential participants within their networks who meet the study’s criteria. This recruitment is facilitated by the existing trust and social ties within the community, making it easier for new participants to accept the invitation to partake in the study. Researchers may provide seeds with specific instructions or materials to aid in this recruitment process, ensuring that the criteria for participation are clearly communicated. The recruitment of new participants is a delicate balance of leveraging social networks while maintaining ethical standards and respecting individuals’ willingness to participate.

Step 4: Iteration

The snowball sampling method is inherently iterative. After collecting data from the newly recruited participants, these individuals are then asked to further recruit from their networks, thereby continuing the chain of referrals. This process of data collection and recruitment is repeated in cycles until the research objectives are met, sufficient data has been collected, or the network of potential participants is exhausted. The iterative nature of snowball sampling allows the study to progressively reach deeper into the target population, uncovering layers of data that might not be accessible through initial seeds alone.

Each cycle of iteration potentially brings in a more diverse set of participants, expanding the depth and breadth of the data collected. It’s important for researchers to monitor the process closely, ensuring that the expanding network continues to align with the study’s criteria and objectives. As the sample grows, researchers must also manage the logistical and ethical considerations that come with a larger and potentially more diverse group of participants.

Advantages of Snowball Sampling

Access to Hidden Populations

One of the most significant advantages of snowball sampling is its ability to penetrate hidden or hard-to-reach populations. Traditional sampling methods often fall short when it comes to accessing groups that are either small in size, highly specialized, or intentionally secluded due to various reasons such as stigma, legal concerns, or social exclusion. By utilizing the existing social networks and the trust within these communities, snowball sampling opens a channel to these otherwise inaccessible groups, enabling researchers to gather data and insights directly from the source.


Compared to other sampling methods that may require extensive outreach efforts, comprehensive databases, or expensive advertising to recruit participants, snowball sampling stands out for its cost efficiency. This method capitalizes on the social connections between potential participants to spread the word about the study, significantly reducing the need for costly recruitment strategies. The referral process inherent to snowball sampling minimizes the financial and logistical burdens on researchers, making it an attractive option for studies with limited budgets.


Snowball sampling’s adaptability across different fields of study is another key advantage. Whether it is in sociology, psychology, marketing, or any other domain where understanding specific social networks or niche populations is crucial, snowball sampling can be tailored to meet the unique demands of the research. Its flexibility in application ensures that regardless of the subject matter or the complexity of the population under study, researchers can modify and implement snowball sampling to suit their specific needs.

Disadvantages of Snowball Sampling


A notable drawback of snowball sampling is the potential for bias in the sample. Since the method relies on referrals from initial participants, there’s a high likelihood that the sample may not be diverse, leading to homogeneity. Participants are more likely to refer individuals within their social circles, who often share similar characteristics, viewpoints, or experiences. This concentration of similar attributes can result in a sample that does not accurately reflect the broader population’s diversity, impacting the generalizability of the findings.

Lack of Representativeness

The non-random nature of snowball sampling further contributes to its difficulty in achieving a representative sample. Unlike probability sampling methods, where each member of the population has a known chance of being selected, snowball sampling does not provide an equal opportunity for all potential participants to be included. This limitation makes it challenging for researchers to claim that their findings are representative of the broader population, which is a critical consideration when attempting to extrapolate results beyond the sample.

Difficulty in Estimating Sample Size

Determining the size of the sample beforehand is another challenge faced by researchers employing snowball sampling. The referral-based recruitment process is inherently unpredictable, making it difficult to estimate how many participants can ultimately be reached. This uncertainty can pose problems for study planning and resource allocation, as researchers might find themselves with either insufficient data for robust analysis or an unexpectedly large sample that exceeds the scope of the study’s resources.


Snowball sampling is a valuable method for accessing hard-to-reach populations and gathering data from groups that are otherwise difficult to study through conventional means. While it offers unique advantages, especially in exploratory research phases, it also presents challenges in terms of sample bias and representativeness. As with any research method, it’s essential to weigh these factors carefully and consider the specific needs of the study before deciding on using snowball sampling. By acknowledging its limitations and taking steps to mitigate potential biases, researchers can leverage snowball sampling effectively to gain insights into hidden or hard-to-reach communities.


  • No References

A: Snowball sampling is a research method where initial participants recruit further study subjects from their acquaintances, creating a growing network of respondents. This technique is particularly useful for accessing hard-to-reach or hidden populations.

A: Snowball sampling is best suited for studies targeting populations that are difficult to access through traditional methods, such as individuals with rare diseases, specific professional networks, or communities with private identities.

A: The main advantages include accessing hidden populations, cost-effectiveness, and flexibility across various fields of study. It leverages existing social networks, making it easier and more economical to gather data from specific groups.

A: By utilizing the social networks of initial participants, snowball sampling taps into personal connections and trust within communities, allowing researchers to reach individuals who might otherwise be inaccessible.

A: The main limitations include potential sample bias, difficulty in ensuring the sample’s representativeness of the broader population, and challenges in estimating the sample size ahead of the study due to its reliance on participant referrals.


Picture of Daniel Croft

Daniel Croft

Daniel Croft is a seasoned continuous improvement manager with a Black Belt in Lean Six Sigma. With over 10 years of real-world application experience across diverse sectors, Daniel has a passion for optimizing processes and fostering a culture of efficiency. He's not just a practitioner but also an avid learner, constantly seeking to expand his knowledge. Outside of his professional life, Daniel has a keen Investing, statistics and knowledge-sharing, which led him to create the website, a platform dedicated to Lean Six Sigma and process improvement insights.

All Posts

Download Template

Free Lean Six Sigma Templates

Improve your Lean Six Sigma projects with our free templates. They're designed to make implementation and management easier, helping you achieve better results.


Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!